It’s the wild west out there these days in HiringLand. A surfeit of talent, a paucity of broad-based professional need, an increasing call for extremely specialized skillsets. And on.
As such, it behoves us all to stay alive to those hiring scenarios that work, however unconventional or apparently unique from our own situations they might be.
Enter Google, and its unique methodology for ensuring its employment rosters are packed with creative, dedicated and entirely appropriate staffers.
Herewith, four Google hiring secrets to get you started:
The culture piece
Chris Hodgson, sector lead for multi-channel solutions with Google Canada, chalks his organization’s hiring wins up to its culture. “Smart creatives don’t care about money; they care about making a difference…. We created passion that people wanted to be a part of and slogans that embodied that culture, like comfortably uncomfortable.”
The hiring players
At Google, the hiring manager is only one of four decisionmakers in a committee vetting potential hires. Any member of the group can veto a pick — even if the manager wants them.
The structured interview
According to the results of a meta-analysis of 85 years of research on job assessments’ ability to predict performance published in 1998, unstructured job interviews are pretty bad at forecasting how someone would perform once hired.
The best predictor? A work sample test that replicates an on-the-job assignment. Next best are tests of general cognitive ability with defined right and wrong answers, and behavioural and situational structured interviews, where candidates are asked a consistent set of questions with clear criteria to assess the quality of their responses.
At Google, though, hiring teams swear by a system that employs combinations of assessment techniques.
The power of the cross-functional interviewer
Google invites someone with little or no connection to the group for which the candidate is interviewing to sit in on the hiring process. In this way, the company enjoys exposure to an impartial assessment from someone who probably has scant interest in a particular job being filled, but is keen to keep the organization’s overall quality of hiring high.